The impulsive idiot in this story is one of the teachers instead of Emily. Emily is more mature and able in this book, making for better reading. Two very general questions guided this work: How are infinite regresses generated in infinite regress arguments? How do infinite regresses logically function as premises in an argument? In answering these questions I clarify the notion of an infinite regress identify different logical forms of infinite regresses describe different kinds of infinite regress arguments distinguish the rhetoric from the logic in infinite regress arguments and suggest ways of improving our discussion and our practice of constructing and evaluating these arguments. This review is from: Infinite Regress (Schooled in Magic Book 9) (Kindle Edition) This is really the first part of a two part story concluded in book 10. My general approach to contribute to such a theory, consists of collecting and evaluating as many infinite regress arguments as possible, comparing and contrasting many of the formal and non-formal properties, looking for recurring patterns, and identifying the properties that appeared essential to those patterns. These consequences of our customary way of using this tool indicate that there is a need for a theory to re-orient our practice. But how sharp or strong is this tool? How effectively is it used? The typical presentation of infinite regress arguments throughout history is so succinct and has so many gaps that it is often unclear how an infinite regress is derived, and why an infinite regress is logically problematic, and as a result, it is often difficult to evaluate infinite regress arguments. The typical presentation of infinite regress arguments throughout history is so succinct and has so many gaps that it is often unclear how an infinite regress. ![]() ![]() The regress relevant for the cosmological argument is the regress of causes: an event occurred because it was caused by another event that occurred before it, which was itself caused by. ![]() We wouldn't have to traverse an infinite amount of time to find ourselves living in the present: the past is finite, the future is potentially infinite.Infinite regress arguments are part of a philosopher's tool kit of argumentation. A positive infinite regress argument employs the regress in question to argue in support of a theory by showing that its alternative involves a vicious regress. So if the universe has a beginning point, it's possible for it to carry on existing for an infinite amount of time "into the future". A potential infinity exists when something can be added to indefinitely, without end. William Lane Craig admits that there could be things that are potentially (not actually) infinite. In the same way, if the past is actually infinite, the present would never have happened, because an infinite amount of time must have passed - this is traversing an actual infinity, which is impossible. If we trace chains of cause and effect back far enough we either get to a Big Bang (the beginning of the universe) or the causes and. An example of an argument that uses the idea of an infinite regress is the Cosmological argument for the existence of God. If you tried to count to infinity, you would never get there. An infinite regress which is considered bad is sometimes called a ‘vicious regress’. For example, if you set of on an infinite journey, you would never get to your destination. If a man can believe an infinite number of things, then there seems to be no reason why he cannot know an infinite number of things. This is psychologically, if not logically, impossible. Another argument tries to show that actual infinities are paradoxical by showing that actual infinity cannot be traversed (crossed). The proposed regress of justification of S’s belief that p would certainly require that he hold an infinite number of beliefs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |